ListCharming was mentioned in a Slate article, claiming that innovative and flexible registries “provide a cover” for cash or space strapped couples. Quite the contrary, every ListCharming registry has been so authentic, with couples spending 20+ hours on registries that have what they actually want and say so much about who they are. The overwhelming response from wedding guests is that they love it. The gifts are much more personal than in traditional registries. And as far as we know, couples actually buy whatever they list, and why wouldn’t they when they could list whatever they wanted in the first place?
This is my comment to the article:
“I’m co-founder of ListCharming. We built it for ourselves so that we could take a long honeymoon and buy all the gifts when we got back. We took the time to put exactly what we wanted on the list, including “priceless” presents like a homecooked meal (clearly you did not need to spend to give us a gift). Now we are buying all the items from our list. It’s great that we had the flexibility to get big ticket items, buy from lots of different stores to get best price, and we didn’t have to store everything while we were away.
This quote from a wedding guest expresses a different point of view: “why would you ever want to use a different list once you have seen listcharming. it’s so personal and lovely and fun and beautiful and charming. it just says so much about the couple, what they love, what they’re into, what their dreams are - and i love participating in all of that.”
ListCharming lets couples be authentic and themselves, which wedding guests love. I encourage Ms Lowrey and Ms Yoffe to consider this point on future wedding articles.”